AI Governance · Last updated June 2026
AI Writing Ethics
The technology is new. The ethics are older. This page sets out how we think AI-assisted writing should be used, and the kinds of use we discourage in the strongest terms.
Principles we encourage
- Honesty — represent your work, your role, and your assistance accurately when context calls for it.
- Originality — use AI to find your own voice more clearly, not to launder someone else's.
- Attribution — credit sources, collaborators, and prior work when your output draws on them.
- Responsibility — treat every word you send as a word you stand behind, regardless of how it was drafted.
- Care for the reader — write to be understood, not to game a metric, a detector, or a feed.
Uses we discourage
- Passing off rewritten material as someone else's original work.
- Generating reviews, endorsements, or testimonials that are not genuine.
- Impersonating named individuals or organisations.
- Producing content whose primary purpose is to deceive, harass, defame, or manipulate.
- Mass-producing low-quality pages designed to capture search traffic rather than serve readers.
- Evading legitimate review processes — academic, journalistic, regulatory — through tone laundering.
Our position on detection
We build tools that make writing genuinely clearer, more human, and more useful to the reader. Detector outcomes are a downstream consequence of that work, not its purpose. We do not market our product as a way to defeat detection, and we do not optimise it to do so.